Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Polymarket Alternative) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Open the market → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Open the market → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Open the market → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Open the market → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Open the market → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Steven Asplund vs. Guilherme Pat | 100% |
| Fight to Go the Distance? | 100% |
| O/U 0.5 Rounds | 100% |
| O/U 1.5 Rounds | 100% |
| O/U 2.5 Rounds | 100% |
| Fight won by KO/TKO? | 0% |
| Asplund to win by KO/TKO? | 0% |
| Pat to win by KO/TKO? | 0% |
| Fight won by submission? | 0% |
Market context
Steven Asplund’s heavyweight bout with Guilherme Pat is the kind of market where the price has already done much of the work: UFC-facing books have generally made Asplund a clear favourite, with a recent average around -300 to -305 and Pat around +240 to +260, which translates to roughly a three-in-four chance for Asplund after removing vig.[1][9][15] That is notably tighter than the 100% YES crowd-implied reading on the current market, so the main comparison point for Polymarket versus Kalshi, Betfair or Smarkets is not direction but scale: Kalshi is quoted in cents and shows Asplund around 72-73¢, while Polymarket has been lower, around 70¢ in the live market snapshots, even though both are pointing to the same favourite.[4][7][12][14]
Comparable cases suggest heavyweights with a strong moneyline favourite can still carry outcome risk because one clean sequence can flip the result, but the market is currently pricing Asplund as the more probable winner rather than a near-lock.[3][17][18] That matters for platform comparison because exchange-style venues such as Betfair and Smarkets typically express the same belief through decimal prices and take a commission on winnings, whereas Polymarket and Kalshi quote direct probability-style prices and differ more on access, KYC, and who can trade than on the underlying fight view. The current gap between sportsbook-derived probabilities and the crowd price is the key read-through: if the market stays at or near 100%, it implies either very thin liquidity or an unusually one-sided thesis that is stronger than the broader betting board.
The main catalysts are straightforward: weigh-in and bout-night confirmation, any late injury or commission issue, and the official UFC result at settlement, since this market resolves only from UFC’s declared outcome.[4][12] The fight is scheduled for the UFC Fight Night card on 8 August 2026, with the market’s settlement window running to 9 August 2026 03:59:59.999Z and a fallback to 50-50 if the bout is cancelled, ruled no contest, not scored, or pushed beyond the stated grace period.[4][12] Traders on Polymarket versus Kalshi should also watch whether either venue updates contract depth or spreads closer to start time, because Kalshi’s 72/28 style quotation and Polymarket’s lower cents price can diverge even when the underlying event has not changed.[4][12][14]
Live Data & Statistics
Live stats load when the match begins. Current market odds are shown above. Trading volume: $744K.
Methodology
This page compares UFC Fight Night: Steven Asplund vs. Guilherme Pat (Heavyweight, Main Card) specifically across Polymarket, Kalshi, Betfair Exchange and Smarkets. The live probability is the Polymarket mid; the comparison columns summarise each venue's fee structure, KYC, settlement currency and payment rails. Every CTA routes to Polymarket Alternative, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees.
Resolution & payout
Settlement is the biggest difference between the four platforms: Polymarket on-chain in USDC (instant), Kalshi USD via CFTC (T+1), Betfair and Smarkets in local currency via bank withdrawal (T+1 to T+3). On-chain settlement clears in minutes — the fastest payout path of the four.
FAQ
- Polymarket vs Kalshi — which is better?
- Depends on your location. Kalshi is CFTC-regulated, US-only with full KYC. Polymarket is global, on-chain, no KYC up to $1,500. Polymarket has ~10x higher liquidity but higher regulatory risk.
- What does Polymarket cost vs Kalshi?
- Polymarket: 0% fees, only Polygon network costs (~$0.01/trade). Kalshi: up to 7% per trade plus spread. For high-frequency traders, Polymarket is dramatically cheaper.
- Which platform has the deepest liquidity?
- Polymarket — by a wide margin. Top markets reach $50-500M volume, Kalshi ~$200M cumulative, Betfair similar. Deeper liquidity means your trade moves the quote less.
- What about Smarkets as an alternative?
- Smarkets is a UK betting exchange with a lower default commission (2%) than Betfair. Liquidity on political markets is below Polymarket, comparable to Kalshi. Geo-blocked in many jurisdictions.
- Are all these platforms regulated?
- No. Kalshi is CFTC-regulated (US). Betfair and Smarkets are UK Gambling Commission licensed. Polymarket operates without explicit regulation — a different risk profile than a regulated sportsbook.
Trade UFC Fight Night: Steven Asplund vs. Guilherme Pat (H… on Polymarket Alternative
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →