🎁 New traders: 100% Deposit Match up to $500 · 0% fees · instant USDC payoutsClaim it →
Skip to main content
HomeGuideCryptoMarketsBlogOpen the market →

Sport Lisboa e Benfica vs. Heart of Midlothian FC

Cross-platform snapshot for "Sport Lisboa e Benfica vs. Heart of Midlothian FC": deepest order book, lowest fee, geo-coverage at a glance.

Sport Lisboa e Benfica 100% Draw 0% Heart of Midlothian FC 0% Volume: $170K Liquidity: $481K Closes: 6 Aug 2026
Open live market →
Sport Lisboa e Benfica vs. Heart of Midlothian FC

Platform comparison

PlatformYES oddsNO oddsFeeKYCSettlement
Polymarket (via Polymarket Alternative) Pick
polygram.ink (preferred broker)
100% 0% 0% (USDC on-chain) No-KYC up to $1,500 USDC, auto via UMA oracle Open the market →
Polymarket (direct)
polymarket.com
100% 0% 0% Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU USDC, on-chain Open the market →
Kalshi
kalshi.com
Up to 7% per trade US-only, KYC required USD Open the market →
Betfair Exchange
betfair.com
2-5% commission Full KYC from first trade GBP / EUR Open the market →
Manifold Markets
manifold.markets
Play-money (mana) None — play-money Mana (no cash-out) Open the market →

Outcome probabilities

Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.

OutcomeProbability
Sport Lisboa e Benfica100%
Draw0%
Heart of Midlothian FC0%

Market context

Benfica are at home to Hearts in the Europa League qualifying tie at Estádio da Luz, with the scheduled kick-off shown as 19:00 UTC on UEFA and data feeds, although some local listings display 21:00 in Lisbon, so traders should anchor to the market’s own settlement window rather than a single external timestamp.[16][10][3] A crowd-implied **100% YES** makes sense in a fixture where the listed prices on bookmaker-style feeds are heavily skewed towards a Benfica win, with decimal home-win quotes around 1.18-1.20 implying an outcome well above 80% before margin, while Hearts are priced as very long outsiders.[11][14][5]

For comparison, Polymarket-style markets expose the crowd view directly as implied probability, whereas Betfair, Smarkets and many books present the same consensus through decimal odds, so the same event can look different depending on whether the platform shows probability, price, or exchange commission. On an exchange, the headline probability is usually closer to the traded price after fees, but the effective price still depends on commission and liquidity; that matters here because a near-certain Benfica line can be pinned close to 100% on a prediction market even when an exchange quote still leaves room for a small lay price or premium. Hearts’ team news also matters less to the broad market than Benfica’s selection and home control, but it can affect whether the final price stays hard against the underdog.[7][20]

The main catalysts are line-ups, late injuries, and any change to the tie’s pre-match context. Recent previews noted several Hearts absentees, including Christian Borchgrevink, Stephen Kingsley, Craig Halkett and Eduardo Ageu, which reinforces the gap between the sides if those omissions remain in place.[7] UEFA’s match page also shows the official competition context and referee assignment, while live feeds indicate Benfica came in from a strong domestic and continental run, so any surprise rotation, weather disruption, or early team-sheet change is the kind of information that could move exchange prices more than a settled crowd number on a platform with broad KYC access.[16][14][1]

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Live Data & Statistics

The Polymarket order book prices Sport Lisboa e Benfica at 100% for "Sport Lisboa e Benfica vs. Heart of Midlothian FC".

Sport Lisboa e Benfica 100% Other 0%

Live stats load when the match begins. Current market odds are shown above. Trading volume: $170K.

Methodology

We read Sport Lisboa e Benfica vs. Heart of Midlothian FC from four platform perspectives: Polymarket (on-chain CLOB), Kalshi (CFTC-regulated exchange), Betfair Exchange (sports book exchange), Smarkets (peer-to-peer betting exchange). Polymarket's live mid is the canonical probability; the side-by-side columns benchmark fees, KYC, settlement currency and deposit rails so you can choose the venue that fits your jurisdiction and trade size.

Resolution & payout

Polymarket settles via UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon. A proposer posts the outcome with a bond, the two-hour window runs, then the smart contract pays USDC.

Kalshi settles USD through the CFTC-regulated clearinghouse — the cleanest variant, with heavier KYC. Betfair Exchange settles in account currency (GBP/EUR), net of 2-5% commission. Smarkets follows the same model as Betfair with a lower default 2% commission.

FAQ

Polymarket vs Kalshi — which is better?
Depends on your location. Kalshi is CFTC-regulated, US-only with full KYC. Polymarket is global, on-chain, no KYC up to $1,500. Polymarket has ~10x higher liquidity but higher regulatory risk.
Which platform has the deepest liquidity?
Polymarket — by a wide margin. Top markets reach $50-500M volume, Kalshi ~$200M cumulative, Betfair similar. Deeper liquidity means your trade moves the quote less.
Is Betfair a Polymarket alternative?
Only partially. Betfair Exchange is UK-focused with a sports-betting emphasis; they have politics markets but with thinner liquidity than Polymarket. Settlement in GBP/EUR, 2-5% commission on winnings.
What about Smarkets as an alternative?
Smarkets is a UK betting exchange with a lower default commission (2%) than Betfair. Liquidity on political markets is below Polymarket, comparable to Kalshi. Geo-blocked in many jurisdictions.
Which platform is accessible globally?
Polymarket is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Kalshi is US-only. Betfair and Smarkets are UK-restricted. Polymarket Alternative has a different geo footprint and routes to Polymarket's order book at 0% fees.
and

Trade Sport Lisboa e Benfica vs. Heart of Midlothian FC on Polymarket Alternative

Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.

Open live market →

Related Topics

Sports