Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Polymarket Alternative) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
68% | 32% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Open the market → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
68% | 32% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Open the market → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Open the market → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Open the market → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Open the market → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| O/U 3.5 | 68% |
| Detroit Tigers vs. San Francisco Giants | 61% |
| O/U 4.5 | 60% |
| O/U 6.5 | 55% |
| Spread -1.5 | 41% |
| O/U 5.5 | 37% |
| Spread -2.5 | 33% |
| Spread -1.5 | 17% |
| Extra Innings | 16% |
| O/U 7.5 | 14% |
| O/U 8.5 | 13% |
| Spread -2.5 | 8% |
| O/U 9.5 | 8% |
| NRFI | 0% |
| 1st 5 Innings Spread -1.5 | 0% |
| 1st 5 Innings Spread -1.5 | 0% |
| 1st 5 Innings O/U 2.5 | 0% |
| 1st 5 Innings O/U 3.5 | 0% |
| 1st 5 Innings O/U 4.5 | 0% |
| 1st 5 Innings O/U 5.5 | 0% |
| 1st 5 Innings O/U 6.5 | 0% |
Market context
The Detroit Tigers and San Francisco Giants are set for a night game in San Francisco, and the market’s 61% YES price implies a modest Tigers edge rather than a strong favourite. That sits a little above the sharper-looking sportsbook consensus in the supplied market snapshot, where the moneyline is close to a pick’em or slight Detroit lean: Covers shows Tigers -107 and Giants -103, while other aggregators cluster around Detroit between roughly -128 and -131 and San Francisco around +118 to +125, which is broadly consistent with a Tigers win probability in the low- to mid-50s once vig is removed.[2][9][10]
Recent comparable pricing shows how to read the current number: on 7 August, several outlets rated Detroit only narrowly ahead, with models around 50.7% to 52.1% for the Tigers and one game forecast even at 54% San Francisco in an older matchup, while the actual result the previous night was a 5-2 Giants win after Detroit had been priced as a small road favourite in parts of the market.[3][5][4][15] For Polymarket-style contracts, the YES percentage is a straight implied probability; on Kalshi, the same event is usually quoted in cents with similar interpretation, while Betfair and Smarkets present decimal-style odds and commonly charge commission on winnings rather than building margin entirely into the quoted price. That means a 61% prediction-market read can look materially different from a sportsbook moneyline because the books bake in vig and sometimes move faster on one-sided liquidity.
For traders, the key catalysts are the confirmed line-up card, any late pitching change, and whether the game remains scheduled for the published 7:15 pm ET start after all pre-game checks. If the game is postponed, the contract stays open until completion, so weather, travel disruption, or an altered make-up date matter more here than in a standard straight settlement market. The main dependency is still the official final result: if the game is played and completed, the winner decides the contract; if it is cancelled without a make-up or ends tied, it settles 50-50 under the market rules.
Live Data & Statistics
Live stats load when the match begins. Current market odds are shown above. Trading volume: $206K.
Methodology
This page compares Detroit Tigers vs. San Francisco Giants specifically across Polymarket, Kalshi, Betfair Exchange and Smarkets. The live probability is the Polymarket mid; the comparison columns summarise each venue's fee structure, KYC, settlement currency and payment rails. Every CTA routes to Polymarket Alternative, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees.
Resolution & payout
Polymarket settles via UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon. A proposer posts the outcome with a bond, the two-hour window runs, then the smart contract pays USDC.
Kalshi settles USD through the CFTC-regulated clearinghouse — the cleanest variant, with heavier KYC. Betfair Exchange settles in account currency (GBP/EUR), net of 2-5% commission. Smarkets follows the same model as Betfair with a lower default 2% commission.
FAQ
- Polymarket vs Kalshi — which is better?
- Depends on your location. Kalshi is CFTC-regulated, US-only with full KYC. Polymarket is global, on-chain, no KYC up to $1,500. Polymarket has ~10x higher liquidity but higher regulatory risk.
- Which platform has the deepest liquidity?
- Polymarket — by a wide margin. Top markets reach $50-500M volume, Kalshi ~$200M cumulative, Betfair similar. Deeper liquidity means your trade moves the quote less.
- What about Smarkets as an alternative?
- Smarkets is a UK betting exchange with a lower default commission (2%) than Betfair. Liquidity on political markets is below Polymarket, comparable to Kalshi. Geo-blocked in many jurisdictions.
- Are all these platforms regulated?
- No. Kalshi is CFTC-regulated (US). Betfair and Smarkets are UK Gambling Commission licensed. Polymarket operates without explicit regulation — a different risk profile than a regulated sportsbook.
- Which platform supports Klarna/SOFORT?
- Directly: none. Polymarket accepts only USDC on Polygon. Polymarket Alternative offers a fiat on-ramp via Klarna or SOFORT (DE/AT/CH) and converts internally to USDC for the Polymarket order book. T+1 processing.
Trade Detroit Tigers vs. San Francisco Giants on Polymarket Alternative
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →