Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Polymarket Alternative) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
55% | 45% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Open the market → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
55% | 45% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Open the market → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Open the market → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Open the market → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Open the market → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| The Hundred, Women: MI London vs Trent Rockets - Completed match? | 55% |
| The Hundred, Women: MI London vs Trent Rockets | 0% |
| The Hundred, Women: MI London vs Trent Rockets - Who wins the toss? | 0% |
Market context
MI London’s women host Trent Rockets at the Kia Oval in a late-stage Hundred group match, with the market’s 0% YES implying an outcome the crowd thinks is effectively off the board. That is hard to square with the live table: Trent Rockets were top on 20 points from six matches, while MI London sat seventh on 6 points, and the teams’ most recent head-to-head at the Oval ended in a Trent Rockets win by nine wickets, a result consistent with the Rockets’ stronger net run-rate and more reliable chase numbers this season.[3][13][10]
For comparison traders, the same fixture has been treated differently across venues: Polymarket-style markets show the outcome as an implied probability, while Kalshi and some sportsbook-style books quote decimal odds or American prices, which can make a near-certain favourite look less extreme than a 0% screen if liquidity is thin or a market is stale. Betfair and Smarkets also price in commission and, for UK-based users, apply stricter KYC and regional access rules than Polymarket’s crypto-first setup; on a match like this, that matters because a low headline price can still hide a meaningful spread after fees. The cricketing frame is also one-sided: Trent Rockets had recently beaten Welsh Fire and had earlier suffered only a narrow defeat to London Spirit, while MI London had struggled near the bottom of the table, so the baseline for a Rockets win remains strong despite any market oddity.[7][11][13]
The main catalysts are line-ups, the toss, and any weather interruption, because The Hundred allows ordinary win settlement for DLS, DRS changes, over-rate sanctions, or walkovers, and a tie would normally be resolved by the competition’s on-field rules if available. The match was listed for 08 August at the Oval, with Trent Rockets opting to bowl in the live scorecard feed, so any last-minute team news or a delayed start can matter more than usual for a market already pinned at the floor.[3][5] That is especially relevant on platforms with different trading frictions: Betfair and Smarkets can move quickly on toss information but fee drag matters more on small edges, while Kalshi-style contracts may feel cleaner to price but still reflect the same underlying cricket uncertainty once the teams are announced.
Live Data & Statistics
Live stats load when the match begins. Current market odds are shown above. Trading volume: $110K.
Methodology
This page compares The Hundred, Women: MI London vs Trent Rockets specifically across Polymarket, Kalshi, Betfair Exchange and Smarkets. The live probability is the Polymarket mid; the comparison columns summarise each venue's fee structure, KYC, settlement currency and payment rails. Every CTA routes to Polymarket Alternative, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees.
Resolution & payout
Polymarket settles via UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon. A proposer posts the outcome with a bond, the two-hour window runs, then the smart contract pays USDC.
Kalshi settles USD through the CFTC-regulated clearinghouse — the cleanest variant, with heavier KYC. Betfair Exchange settles in account currency (GBP/EUR), net of 2-5% commission. Smarkets follows the same model as Betfair with a lower default 2% commission.
FAQ
- Polymarket vs Kalshi — which is better?
- Depends on your location. Kalshi is CFTC-regulated, US-only with full KYC. Polymarket is global, on-chain, no KYC up to $1,500. Polymarket has ~10x higher liquidity but higher regulatory risk.
- What does Polymarket cost vs Kalshi?
- Polymarket: 0% fees, only Polygon network costs (~$0.01/trade). Kalshi: up to 7% per trade plus spread. For high-frequency traders, Polymarket is dramatically cheaper.
- What about Smarkets as an alternative?
- Smarkets is a UK betting exchange with a lower default commission (2%) than Betfair. Liquidity on political markets is below Polymarket, comparable to Kalshi. Geo-blocked in many jurisdictions.
- Are all these platforms regulated?
- No. Kalshi is CFTC-regulated (US). Betfair and Smarkets are UK Gambling Commission licensed. Polymarket operates without explicit regulation — a different risk profile than a regulated sportsbook.
- Which platform supports Klarna/SOFORT?
- Directly: none. Polymarket accepts only USDC on Polygon. Polymarket Alternative offers a fiat on-ramp via Klarna or SOFORT (DE/AT/CH) and converts internally to USDC for the Polymarket order book. T+1 processing.
Trade The Hundred, Women: MI London vs Trent Rockets on Polymarket Alternative
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →