Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Polymarket Alternative) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Open the market → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Open the market → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Open the market → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Open the market → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Open the market → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| 1H O/U 18.5 | 100% |
| 1H O/U 21.5 | 100% |
| 1Q Spread -1.5 | 100% |
| 1Q Spread -0.5 | 100% |
| 1Q O/U 3.5 | 100% |
| 1Q O/U 6.5 | 100% |
| 1Q O/U 9.5 | 100% |
| 1Q O/U 12.5 | 100% |
| 1Q O/U 15.5 | 100% |
| Georgia Tech 1H O/U 12.5 | 100% |
| 1Q Moneyline | 100% |
| Both Teams to Score Points - Q1 | 100% |
| O/U 32.5 | 96% |
| O/U 38.5 | 95% |
| Georgia Tech O/U 19.5 | 94% |
| O/U 44.5 | 92% |
| 2Q O/U 7.5 | 92% |
| O/U 28.5 | 91% |
| 1H O/U 24.5 | 91% |
| 1H O/U 27.5 | 91% |
| 2Q O/U 10.5 | 91% |
| Georgia Tech 1H O/U 14.5 | 91% |
| Georgia Tech 1H O/U 16.5 | 91% |
| Stanford 1H O/U 8.5 | 91% |
| 1H Spread -2.5 | 87% |
| Georgia Tech vs. Stanford | 83% |
| O/U 48.5 | 83% |
| Stanford O/U 16.5 | 81% |
| Spread -1.5 | 78% |
| O/U 50.5 | 78% |
| 2Q Spread -3.5 | 77% |
| O/U 36.5 | 76% |
| Spread -2.5 | 74% |
| O/U 40.5 | 73% |
| O/U 42.5 | 73% |
| Stanford O/U 19.5 | 71% |
| O/U 52.5 | 70% |
| O/U 46.5 | 68% |
| Spread -8.5 | 66% |
| Spread -3.5 | 66% |
| 4Q O/U 7.5 | 65% |
| Spread -4.5 | 64% |
| Spread -5.5 | 63% |
| Spread -6.5 | 61% |
| O/U 56.5 | 56% |
| 4Q O/U 10.5 | 56% |
| O/U 54.5 | 55% |
| 4Q Moneyline | 55% |
| Spread -7.5 | 53% |
| Spread -24.5 | 50% |
| Spread -21.5 | 50% |
| Spread -0.5 | 50% |
| Spread -0.5 | 50% |
| Spread -12.5 | 50% |
| O/U 30.5 | 50% |
| O/U 34.5 | 50% |
| 1H Spread -5.5 | 50% |
| 1H Spread -3.5 | 50% |
| 1H Spread -1.5 | 50% |
| 1H Spread -0.5 | 50% |
| 1H Spread -1.5 | 50% |
| 2H Spread -5.5 | 50% |
| 2H Spread -3.5 | 50% |
| 2H Spread -2.5 | 50% |
| 2H Spread -1.5 | 50% |
| 2H Spread -0.5 | 50% |
| 2H Spread -1.5 | 50% |
| 2H O/U 18.5 | 50% |
| 2H O/U 21.5 | 50% |
| 2H O/U 24.5 | 50% |
| 2H O/U 27.5 | 50% |
| 2H O/U 30.5 | 50% |
| 2Q Spread -5.5 | 50% |
| 2Q Spread -2.5 | 50% |
| 2Q Spread -1.5 | 50% |
| 2Q Spread -0.5 | 50% |
| 2Q Spread -1.5 | 50% |
| 2Q O/U 13.5 | 50% |
| 2Q O/U 16.5 | 50% |
| 2Q O/U 19.5 | 50% |
| 3Q Spread -5.5 | 50% |
| 3Q Spread -1.5 | 50% |
| 3Q Spread -0.5 | 50% |
| 3Q Spread -1.5 | 50% |
| 3Q O/U 3.5 | 50% |
| 3Q O/U 6.5 | 50% |
| 3Q O/U 9.5 | 50% |
| 3Q O/U 15.5 | 50% |
| 4Q Spread -5.5 | 50% |
| 4Q Spread -1.5 | 50% |
| 4Q Spread -0.5 | 50% |
| 4Q Spread -1.5 | 50% |
| 4Q O/U 13.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech O/U 22.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech O/U 25.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech O/U 28.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech O/U 31.5 | 50% |
| Stanford O/U 22.5 | 50% |
| Stanford O/U 25.5 | 50% |
| Stanford O/U 28.5 | 50% |
| Stanford 1H O/U 10.5 | 50% |
| Stanford 1H O/U 12.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech 2H O/U 11.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech 2H O/U 13.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech 2H O/U 15.5 | 50% |
| Stanford 2H O/U 9.5 | 50% |
| Stanford 2H O/U 11.5 | 50% |
| Stanford 2H O/U 13.5 | 50% |
| 2H Moneyline | 50% |
| Georgia Tech O/U 3.5 | 50% |
| Stanford O/U 2.5 | 50% |
| 1H Moneyline | 50% |
| 2Q Moneyline | 50% |
| Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - 1H | 50% |
| Both Teams to Score a Touchdown | 50% |
| Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - Q2 | 50% |
| Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - 2H | 50% |
| Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - Q4 | 50% |
| Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - Q1 | 50% |
| Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - Q3 | 50% |
| Both Teams to Score Points - Q3 | 50% |
| Both Teams to Score Points - Q2 | 50% |
| Both Teams to Score Points - Q4 | 50% |
| Game Goes to Overtime | 50% |
| Kickoff or Punt Return Touchdown | 50% |
| Pick-Six Scored | 50% |
| Georgia Tech vs. Stanford: Total Touchdowns O/U 4.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech vs. Stanford: Total Touchdowns O/U 6.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 0.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech vs. Stanford: Total Touchdowns O/U 5.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 1.5 | 50% |
| Stanford Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 0.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 2.5 | 50% |
| Stanford Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 1.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech Total Passing Yards: O/U 200.5 | 50% |
| Stanford Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 2.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech Total Passing Yards: O/U 225.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech Total Passing Yards: O/U 250.5 | 50% |
| Stanford Total Passing Yards: O/U 225.5 | 50% |
| Stanford Total Passing Yards: O/U 200.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech Total Rushing Yards: O/U 150.5 | 50% |
| Stanford Total Passing Yards: O/U 250.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech Total Rushing Yards: O/U 125.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech Total Rushing Yards: O/U 175.5 | 50% |
| Stanford Total Rushing Yards: O/U 125.5 | 50% |
| Stanford Total Rushing Yards: O/U 150.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 350.5 | 50% |
| Stanford Total Rushing Yards: O/U 175.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 400.5 | 50% |
| Stanford Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 350.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 375.5 | 50% |
| Stanford Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 400.5 | 50% |
| Stanford Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 375.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech 40+ Yard Field Goals Made: O/U 0.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech 40+ Yard Field Goals Made: O/U 1.5 | 50% |
| Stanford 40+ Yard Field Goals Made: O/U 0.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech Field Goals Made: O/U 0.5 | 50% |
| Stanford 40+ Yard Field Goals Made: O/U 1.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech Field Goals Made: O/U 1.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech Field Goals Made: O/U 2.5 | 50% |
| Stanford Field Goals Made: O/U 0.5 | 50% |
| Stanford Field Goals Made: O/U 1.5 | 50% |
| Stanford Field Goals Made: O/U 2.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech Total Receptions: O/U 14.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech Total Receptions: O/U 19.5 | 50% |
| Stanford Total Receptions: O/U 14.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech Total Receptions: O/U 24.5 | 50% |
| Stanford Total Receptions: O/U 19.5 | 50% |
| Stanford Total Receptions: O/U 24.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech Total First Downs: O/U 19.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech Total First Downs: O/U 21.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech Total First Downs: O/U 23.5 | 50% |
| Stanford Total First Downs: O/U 19.5 | 50% |
| Stanford Total First Downs: O/U 23.5 | 50% |
| Stanford Total First Downs: O/U 21.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech vs. Stanford: Total 4th Down Conversions O/U 0.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech vs. Stanford: Total Successful Two-Point Conversions O/U 0.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech vs. Stanford: Total Defensive/Special Teams Touchdowns O/U 0.5 | 50% |
| Spread -9.5 | 49% |
| O/U 58.5 | 46% |
| 4Q Spread -2.5 | 45% |
| 3Q Moneyline | 45% |
| Spread -10.5 | 43% |
| Spread -11.5 | 41% |
| 4Q Spread -3.5 | 41% |
| 4Q O/U 16.5 | 37% |
| O/U 64.5 | 36% |
| 1H O/U 30.5 | 36% |
| 3Q Spread -2.5 | 36% |
| Spread -14.5 | 35% |
| Spread -12.5 | 35% |
| O/U 62.5 | 35% |
| 3Q O/U 12.5 | 35% |
| O/U 60.5 | 34% |
| O/U 66.5 | 34% |
| Spread -18.5 | 33% |
| Spread -17.5 | 32% |
| 3Q Spread -3.5 | 32% |
| 4Q O/U 19.5 | 31% |
| O/U 68.5 | 20% |
| Spread -20.5 | 18% |
| Spread -4.5 | 17% |
| Spread -2.5 | 14% |
| Spread -9.5 | 14% |
| Spread -1.5 | 13% |
| Spread -6.5 | 13% |
| Spread -3.5 | 12% |
| Spread -16.5 | 10% |
| Spread -10.5 | 8% |
| Spread -13.5 | 3% |
| 1Q Spread -3.5 | 0% |
| 1Q Spread -0.5 | 0% |
| 1Q Spread -1.5 | 0% |
| 1Q Spread -3.5 | 0% |
Market context
The Georgia Tech vs. Stanford prediction market currently prices this outcome at 100% YES. In the upcoming college football game between Georgia Tech and Stanford, scheduled for September 26 at 10:30PM ET: This market will resolve to "Georgia Tech" if Georgia Tech win the game. This market …
Live Data & Statistics
Live stats load when the match begins. Current market odds are shown above. Trading volume: $571K.
Methodology
We read Georgia Tech vs. Stanford from four platform perspectives: Polymarket (on-chain CLOB), Kalshi (CFTC-regulated exchange), Betfair Exchange (sports book exchange), Smarkets (peer-to-peer betting exchange). Polymarket's live mid is the canonical probability; the side-by-side columns benchmark fees, KYC, settlement currency and deposit rails so you can choose the venue that fits your jurisdiction and trade size.
Resolution & payout
Settlement is the biggest difference between the four platforms: Polymarket on-chain in USDC (instant), Kalshi USD via CFTC (T+1), Betfair and Smarkets in local currency via bank withdrawal (T+1 to T+3). On-chain settlement clears in minutes — the fastest payout path of the four.
FAQ
- Polymarket vs Kalshi — which is better?
- Depends on your location. Kalshi is CFTC-regulated, US-only with full KYC. Polymarket is global, on-chain, no KYC up to $1,500. Polymarket has ~10x higher liquidity but higher regulatory risk.
- What does Polymarket cost vs Kalshi?
- Polymarket: 0% fees, only Polygon network costs (~$0.01/trade). Kalshi: up to 7% per trade plus spread. For high-frequency traders, Polymarket is dramatically cheaper.
- Which platform has the deepest liquidity?
- Polymarket — by a wide margin. Top markets reach $50-500M volume, Kalshi ~$200M cumulative, Betfair similar. Deeper liquidity means your trade moves the quote less.
- Is Betfair a Polymarket alternative?
- Only partially. Betfair Exchange is UK-focused with a sports-betting emphasis; they have politics markets but with thinner liquidity than Polymarket. Settlement in GBP/EUR, 2-5% commission on winnings.
- What about Smarkets as an alternative?
- Smarkets is a UK betting exchange with a lower default commission (2%) than Betfair. Liquidity on political markets is below Polymarket, comparable to Kalshi. Geo-blocked in many jurisdictions.
%22%2F%3E%3Cpath%20d%3D%22M%206%2066%20A%2026%2026%200%200%201%2058%2066%22%20fill%3D%22%23E6B98D%22%20opacity%3D%220.9%22%2F%3E%3Ccircle%20cx%3D%2232%22%20cy%3D%2226%22%20r%3D%2222%22%20fill%3D%22%23F5CBA7%22%2F%3E%3Crect%20x%3D%2210%22%20y%3D%224%22%20width%3D%2244%22%20height%3D%2214%22%20rx%3D%227%22%20fill%3D%22%2314b8a6%22%20opacity%3D%220.9%22%2F%3E%3Crect%20x%3D%228%22%20%20y%3D%2218%22%20width%3D%228%22%20%20height%3D%2218%22%20rx%3D%224%22%20fill%3D%22%2314b8a6%22%20opacity%3D%220.7%22%2F%3E%3Crect%20x%3D%2248%22%20y%3D%2218%22%20width%3D%228%22%20%20height%3D%2218%22%20rx%3D%224%22%20fill%3D%22%2314b8a6%22%20opacity%3D%220.7%22%2F%3E%3C%2Fsvg%3E){kind=small}
and%22%2F%3E%3Cpath%20d%3D%22M%206%2066%20A%2026%2026%200%200%201%2058%2066%22%20fill%3D%22%23E6B98D%22%20opacity%3D%220.9%22%2F%3E%3Ccircle%20cx%3D%2232%22%20cy%3D%2226%22%20r%3D%2222%22%20fill%3D%22%23F5CBA7%22%2F%3E%3Cpath%20d%3D%22M%2010%2026%20A%2022%2028%200%200%201%2054%2026%22%20fill%3D%22%2314b8a6%22%20opacity%3D%220.9%22%2F%3E%3C%2Fsvg%3E){kind=small}
Trade Georgia Tech vs. Stanford on Polymarket Alternative
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →