Counter-Strike: 3DMAX vs Liquid (BO3) - CS Asia Championships Group B

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

3DMAX meet Liquid in a best-of-three lower-bracket playoff match at the CS Asia Championships group stage, with the market still live despite the original late-night ET slot and a settlement deadline that runs well into 21 May UTC. The current 55% Polymarket price is close to a narrow favourite rather than a strong edge, and it should be read against other venues’ conventions: Polymarket and Smarkets quote straightforward implied probability, while Kalshi’s prices are usually easier to read as dollar-style contract levels; Betfair’s exchange price can move more sharply because it reflects matched liquidity and commission rather than a house margin. In practical terms, a mid-50s view implies the contest is being priced as roughly even with a slight lean to the team judged more reliable across a BO3 map pool.

Head-to-head data on Liquipedia and other match-tracking sites shows these teams have enough tier-one overlap for map veto patterns to matter more than pure recent scorelines. Liquid generally carry the stronger top-end reputation, but 3DMAX have been credible enough in international play to keep a BO3 competitive if their preferred maps survive the veto. That is the same sort of setup where Polymarket can sit a little above 50% while exchange books and Kalshi may drift depending on liquidity, because the market is sensitive to one veto change or a late schedule update.

The main catalysts are confirmation of the start time, whether the lower-bracket quarter-final is played on schedule, and any bracket knock-on effects from the wider CS Asia Championships group. Liquipedia’s match listings and tournament social channels are the key checks if there is a delay or a venue-side change, because a postponement beyond the settlement window would push the market towards its 50-50 rule rather than a team winner. On comparable esports markets, Polymarket often reacts first to organiser posts, while Kalshi and Smarkets tend to reprice more visibly once the match is officially live or a map has begun.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

This page compares Counter-Strike: 3DMAX vs Liquid (BO3) - CS Asia Championships Group B specifically across Polymarket, Kalshi, Betfair Exchange and Smarkets. Live odds come from the Polymarket order book; the other venues' contract details are maintained manually because their APIs aren't directly comparable. Every CTA routes to PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees.

Resolution & payout

Polymarket settles via UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon. A proposer posts the outcome with a bond, the two-hour window runs, then the smart contract pays USDC.

Kalshi settles USD through the CFTC-regulated clearinghouse — the cleanest variant, with heavier KYC. Betfair Exchange settles in account currency (GBP/EUR), net of 2-5% commission. Smarkets follows the same model as Betfair with a lower default 2% commission.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

Is this market available outside the US?

PolyGram is available in most jurisdictions where Polymarket isn't directly accessible. Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check local regulations.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

What does it cost to trade on PolyGram?

Zero. PolyGram routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.